Monthly Archives: April 2013

Thatcher’s Legacy: Tory links to Ulster broken: Irish links to Britain built?

Dr John Coulter is a ‘Radical Unionist’ commentator and former columnist for the Blanket. He writes for the Irish Daily Star.
.
‘Maggie, Maggie, Maggie, Out, Out Out!’ That was a popular chant of the late 1980s. But that chant was not heard at a republican rally or a miners’ demonstration. This chant was being yelled by Unionists at a rally to protest at the 1985 Anglo-Irish Agreement.

As a young News Letter reporter, I spent late 1985 and much of 1986 tramping the damp and cold streets of Loyal Ulster producing column inch after column inch of copy on the Ulster Says No and Ulster Still Says No protests.

It is rather bemusing to see Unionists heap praise on the recently departed former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher when in 1985/86, burning effigies of the Tory PM was the order of the day at anti-Dublin Diktat rallies.

Much has been made in the media about the so-called ‘celebration’ parties surrounding her death, especially in republican districts in Northern Ireland and mining communities in Britain. It makes me wonder what the reaction in Unionist communities in Ulster would have been if Thatcher had died of a sudden stroke in early 1986 instead of 2013.

I recall reporting on one of the biggest Ulster Says No rallies outside of the massive Belfast City Hall protest in my home town of Ballymena in North Antrim in 1986. On the platform sat the then Unionist leadership – Ian Paisley senior of the DUP, James Molyneaux of the UUP, and Jim Kilfedder from North Down of the Ulster Popular Unionist Party.

I looked up to see an effigy of Maggie being waved above my head. Suddenly, there was a loud cheer and the effigy erupted in flames above my head! I pushed people behind me to get away from the ‘flaming Maggie’ as moments later the effigy fell to the ground.

I just wonder what the thoughts of many of the thousands of loyalists who attended that Ballymena rally on that cold day in early 1986 are today with Mrs Thatcher now dead.

She was regarded as a devout supporter of the Union, yet from 15 November 1985, on the day she signed the Anglo-Irish Agreement with Garret FiztGerald at Hillsborough, she became almost as big a hate figure in Unionism in Northern Ireland as in the republican community.

When she died, did she redeem herself in the eyes of the Unionist community, or even had she been forgiven by the time of her political downfall in the early 1990s?

Thatcher the Snatcher was another nickname she was labelled with – that’s how loyalists came to hate Maggie after she ‘snatched the Union’ away from Protestants by signing the Anglo-Irish Agreement. Signed at her Hillsborough bolthole in Co Down with then Taoiseach FitzGerald, with the stroke of a pen Thatcher became the most hated woman in loyalism since the conflict erupted in 1968. In four years, the Tory PM went from hero to zero among loyalists despite her tough stance against the republican hunger strikes in 1980 and 1981.

While IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands MP saw an estimated 100,000 walk behind his coffin in 1981, Thatcher’s signing of the Dublin Accord four years’ later saw an estimated 250,000 loyalists attend a massive Belfast City Hall protest rally at which Paisley senior issued his defiant ‘Never, never, never.’ speech.

The Anglo-Irish Agreement gave the Republic its first say in the running of the North since partition in the 1920s. The Dublin Diktat, as it was dubbed, led to the formal opening of the Maryfield Secretariat near Belfast where Southern civil servants were based.

But in reality, did Maggie really become Thatcher the Hatcher rather than Thatcher the Snatcher? Did she hatch a plan to give Unionists an effective say in the running of the Republic, but they were so busy protesting they failed to see the political gift Thatcher had handed them? While some may suggest that in signing the Anglo-Irish Agreement, Thatcher laid the foundation for the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and the modern peace process, is the real legacy of November 1985 still to be written?

Is the true legacy of the Anglo-Irish Agreement the foundation for the Republic to rejoin the Commonwealth and for southern Ireland to join the United Kingdom in leaving the European Union? On the surface, Maryfield was an historic compromise which angered Unionists. Was it simply to get greater cross-border security to force the Provos to the negotiating table, and ultimately the 1994 ceasefire?

Unionism failed to return the serve of Maryfield. Unionists took to the streets in their tens of thousands instead of the then Unionist leadership demanding an effective say in the running of the Republic. Partition was The Great Betrayal when Carson and Craig condemned tens of thousands of Southern-based Unionists to their fate in a Catholic-dominated, nationalist-run Irish Free State. What about the contributions which Southern Ulster counties had made to the original Ulster Volunteers?

In 1985, Messrs Paisley senior, Molyneaux and Kilfedder should have been on the first train to Dublin to open a Unionist Embassy in Leinster House and demand that the Dail address the faults of the make-shift banana republic. Perhaps in 1985 if Unionism had whined in Dublin rather than walked in Ulster, the IRA and INLA would have been brought to their knees sooner than the 1990s?

The anti-Thatcher ‘Ulster Says No’ campaign saw a mobilisation among loyalists not witnessed since the Ulster Workers’ Council strike of May 1974 which collapsed the Sunningdale Executive. However, just as Thatcher had faced down republicans over the hunger strikers’ demands, so too, she was equally determined to face down loyalist demands to ditch the 1985 Agreement.

Not only did moderate Unionists mobilise by joining the mainstream Unionist parties, but Thatcher’s determination to keep the Agreement saw a huge boost in membership of loyalist death squads such as the UDA and UVF. It also sparked the creation of numerous new hardline groups as loyalists frantically searched for means to topple the Agreement. Working class loyalists launched the Ulster Clubs movement, which was a mirror image of the Unionist Clubs network formed in the early 1900s to combat Home Rule for Ireland.

The most notorious of the groups was the red-bereted Ulster Resistance, once openly supported by former and current DUP leaders and First Ministers Ian Paisley senior and Peter Robinson. Army agent the late Brian Nelson arranged for a huge consignment of South African weapons to be smuggled into the North for Ulster Resistance, the UVF and UDA, a move which resulted in the murders of dozens of nationalists.

The extremist Movement for Self-Determination (MSD) was also launched to campaign for an independent Ulster, with the racist National Front also arriving in the North to try and take advantage of loyalist unrest.

The Agreement also ended the historic link between the Ulster Unionist Party and Thatcher’s Tory Party when the Ulster Unionist Council withdrew from the National Union of Conservative and Unionist Associations. When she gave her blessing for the launch of Conservative Associations in the North, the project quickly floundered such was the anger against her. While many who established the Conservative Associations in Northern Ireland in the late 1980s were themselves Right-wingers and loved to be photographed with Thatcher, the immediate legacy of the Anglo-Irish Agreement meant that the Tory move into Ulster was doomed from the start. What right-thinking Unionist would vote for the party which had signed away the Union?

In 1985, Thatcher was seen as a traitor by Northern Ireland Unionism for signing the Anglo-Irish Agreement. That was her immediate legacy among the Unionist community. But when – not if – the Commonwealth standard flutters over Leinster House, and as the south grows through Ulster ever more interconnected with the mainland, Unionist history may quickly rewrite her legacy.

Share

Not Enough Has Been Done To Uphold The Good Friday Agreement: David McCann

Column: Not enough has been done to uphold the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement

It’s true Northern Ireland has come a long way over the last fifteen years, but we cannot afford to hang the ‘mission accomplished’ banner over the peace process, writes David McCann.

                                        David McCann

WE ARE FAST  approaching the fifteenth anniversary of the signing of the Good Friday Agreement. When the deal was eventually agreed there was a palpable sense of hope that after thirty years of violence and 3,529 deaths that the Northern Ireland problem had been solved for good. Ever since then despite all the challenges the agreements basic principles of power-sharing and inclusion are still intact. At the last election just one MLA was elected on a platform to dismantle current institutions in Northern Ireland.

So we have a durable form of government with broad popular support what on earth could possibly be wrong with that?  Scratch the surface and there is quite a bit. In any debate about political life in the North we tend to get hypnotised by this argument that we should simply be grateful that the province has a functioning government. Yet more than a decade after the signing of the agreement I think it is now time that we started asking what exactly the current executive in Northern Ireland is doing to help heal our divided society.

 

Read more »

Share

A Oneness of Humanity

This post first appeared on the South Belfast ACT blog

sbact@wordpress.com 

A Oneness of Humanity?

by

We see the bigoted celebrations at the death of a woman. We watch as Republicans blatantly produce shows of strength and dress children as terrorists (not as one commentator compares it to cowboys and indians). They continually attempt to take away or strip us of our culture by the re-routing of religious order parades. Yet our Government says we are very much entering into a shared future. The following is a speech by the Dalai Lama given in 1997. It seems still very relevant today. Today’s world requires us to accept the oneness of humanity. In the past, isolated communities could afford to think of one another as fundamentally separate. Some could even exist in total isolation. But nowadays, whatever happens in one region eventually affects many other areas. Within the context of our new interdependence, self-interest clearly lies in considering the interest of others.

 

Read more »

Share

The Protestant Working Class in Belfast: Education and Civic Erosion-An Alternative Analysis: Gareth Mulvenna

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Protestant Working Class in Belfast: Education and Civic Erosion – An Alternative Analysis

 

I also remember coming home from school along Foreman Street with my books and hearing the odd remark from people standing at their doors: ‘The young ones are getting the learning now alright. Look at the books under his arms!’

 

– John Young Simms, Farewell to the Hammer – A Shankill Boyhood [1]

Introduction

For a number of years the issues of social decline and educational underachievement in Protestant working class areas of Belfast has vexed concerned parties from community workers[2] to policy makers[3]. It is generally thought that the problem has origins in two key areas. The first of these was the gradual decline, from the late 1950s onwards of the traditional industries in Belfast such as shipbuilding and the ropeworks which would have provided employment for generations of working class Protestant males who resided in inner city areas which were close to these hubs of labour. It has often been considered that ease of access to these jobs for Protestant males led to education becoming an afterthought, and a potential path of progression which was regarded as being of little importance.

 

Read more »

Share

GARETH MULVENNA PhD:

Gareth Mulvenna, a native of North Belfast and a young man in his early thirties, completed a PhD in Queens University in 2009.  The Doctorate was in Contemporary Irish Politics and the bulk of his research was focused on the Protestant/Loyalist/Unionist community in Belfast.  He is currently at the forefront of raising awareness of the Protestant working class experience in Belfast from pre Troubles to post conflict.  Gareth has written extensively recently on the subject and we are honoured to reproduce some of his articles on longkeshindeout.

Share

PUP membership back to GFA levels–Dr. Aaron Edwards

PUP membership back to GFA levels – by Dr Aaron Edwards

April 4, 2013Posted in: News & Current Affairs, Opinion

Since Billy Hutchinson became the leader of the PUP in October 2011 there has been an awful lot of baloney talked about the PUP ‘not being the party it used to be’. As a long-standing historian of the party, having personally spilt an awful lot of ink on detailing the PUP’s trials and tribulations over the years, I feel this is a knowledge deficit that requires urgent redress, lest we should misunderstand the kind of political party the PUP actually is.

 

Former PUP leader Dawn Purvis, current PUP leader Billy Hutchinson and Wintson Churchill Rea

 

Political parties are reflective of their membership. They have to be, otherwise what would be the point in organising collectively along political lines? They are also reflective of the context in which they operate.

 

Read more »

Share

LOYALIST ART EXHIBITION


Geordie Morrow–UVF ex-prisoner in Crumlin Road Gaol.

 

On Thursday 28th March an innovative Art Exhibition was launched in the confines of Crumlin Road Gaol. This initial display highlights the paintings and drawings of three ex UVF/RHC prisoners and spans the full course of the Prison Years within the conflict.  It illustrates the level of skill possessed by many ex prisoners and hopefully will act as a catalyst to bring others forward to showcase further competence.  The exhibition was launched by Plum Smith, spokesman for UVF/RHC ex prisoners who currently works for EPIC. 

William “Plum” Smith

28th March 2013

Crumlin Road Gaol

 

First of all on behalf of the Ex-Loyalist Prisoners Community I would like thank you all for coming to the initial Launch of the Ex-Loyalist Prisoner Art Exhibition.

EPIC (Ex-Prisoners Interpretative Centre) is an organisation that represents the constituency of RHC/UVF Ex-Prisoners. Over the course of the conflict more that 10,000 Loyalists ended up incarcerated in the Prisons and Prison Camps of Northern Ireland and beyond. Almost every one of them passed through the gates of this prison at some time. Each one has their own story, their own experiences and each had their own way of dealing with the sentences handed down to them from the courts.  Many political prisoners took up various positive and constructive pastimes and careers while they were incarcerated including, music, arts, writing, handicrafts and education. Some, like Danny Strutt and Tommy Cull, were even more creative by designing their own early release scheme when they escaped from these walls in 1973.

Today we present a small example of the work of three ex-loyalist prisoners who took up art and honed their talents by painting and sketching their way through their years of imprisonment. Upon their release they continue to paint and sketch, some as a pastime and some as a profession.

Their art is also a record of their time in prison a pictorial history captured by vivid imagination captured by the stroke of a pencil or the swish of a brush. There is an ocean of talent and exhibits hidden within the wider ex-prisoner community and by launching this exhibition we hope to stimulate more of the ex-prisoner community to come forward and display whatever creativity or talent they developed while they were imprisoned during the conflict.

Today I can see ex- loyalist and ex-republican prisoners in the audience as well as the general public. I think both ex-prisoner communities can agree for the benefit of the general public that it certainly wasn’t like this when we were last in here. The sample’s of art you will see here covers over three decades of the conflict and a message and lesson to us all.

As we stand on the eve of the 15th Anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement the beauty of these paintings and sketches also tells the story of thousands of young men, young families and loved ones who endured the suffering and penalties of incarceration during the course of the conflict. We must all tell our stories whether it be through art, literature, poetry or whatever medium so that future generations will never have to endure the suffrage of our generation.

The Launch was attended by over 100 people from all walks of life and was a thorough success which we hope to build on. Any ex-prisoner who wishes to come forward with other arts works, literature, poetry or any other medium of expression is asked to get in touch with EPIC.

The Art Exhibition will now be open to the Public from Monday, Wednesday & Friday beginning on Monday 8th April between 1pm-2pm. Also there will be evening sessions between 5pm-7pm on Wednesday 10th, 17th & 24th April.

Admission Free.

 

 

Share

Tartans: Young Men and Loyalist Paramilitaries in the Early 1970’s by Gareth Mulvenna

Tartans: Young Men and Loyalist Paramilitarism in the early 1970s

gmulvenna.wordpress.com

g.mulvenna@qub.ac.uk

One of the issues I have always been extremely interested in while researching contemporary political history in Northern Ireland is the emergence of ‘Tartan’ gangs in working class Protestant areas in the early 1970s. I am currently trying to piece together enough material to write an article about the Tartans.

Below are some observations I made about the Tartans and the effect of violence on young people during the early period of the Troubles while I was writing my Ph.D. thesis.

 

An opportunity missed? The start of the Troubles, the ‘Schools project in community relations’ report and the emergence of paramilitary youth wings and the Tartan gangs.

Read more »

Share